Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Licker Bottle Cozy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 03:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Licker Bottle Cozy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have been unable to establish this subject's notability. Lachlan Foley (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep this recording clearly satisfies WP:NMUSIC, in that it charted both in Australia and the US. Dan arndt (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I think WP:NMUSIC puts low standards for articles but this article meets it. Bryce Carmony (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Obvious keep from it actually being a chart hit - this is not a high-quality nomination - David Gerard (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, charted.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Dan arndt's additions - good work. Gongshow talk 07:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.