| < December 31 | January 2 > |
|---|
Contents
- 1 January 1
- 1.1 File:PauGaron.jpg
- 1.2 File:Akapic.jpg
- 1.3 File:Folgersonurbutt.jpg
- 1.4 File:Maria Felix & Dolores del Rio.jpg
- 1.5 File:María Félix De Noche.jpg
- 1.6 File:Itnltd.jpg
- 1.7 File:Bts book.jpg
- 1.8 File:Dan sanders.jpg
- 1.9 File:Anna sathe.jpg
- 1.10 File:2005 Xentenario Alt2.jpg
- 1.11 File:2006 Away2.jpg
- 1.12 File:2006 Local2.jpg
- 1.13 File:2007 Loca2l.jpg
- 1.14 File:2008.03.29.1836.tanguy logo.png
- 1.15 File:6ugliveraw.jpg
- 1.16 File:6ugfhm.jpg
- 1.17 File:GubanovaThreiplandGovorkov.jpg
- 1.18 File:FingaskMural&LoftyBuchanan2008.jpg
- 1.19 File:FingaskMuralKey2007.jpg
- 1.20 File:2008-Lindsay-Hartley-CELEBRITY-PHOTO-L.jpg
- 1.21 File:File name.ext
January 1
edit
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PauGaron.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File indicates PD, however this was published in 1923 from The Blue Book of the Screen. http://silentgents.com/BBGaron.html --Thirdship (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Uploader has been advised on how to supply permissions by email. We can always revisit this later, although the article it was used in seems to have been deleted (which means that at least one of the alphabet soup options at FFD applies here). Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Akapic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Professional style photo of a band. Likely copyrighted. Unlikely uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 04:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploader served as the band's manager and business agent for a number of years and, as such, often also served as photographer. This information is factual common knowledge and is not in dispute. The previous comment is unwarranted slander, legal ramifications may apply. Band can be contacted through their web-site for further information and/or confirmation of the facts. If Wikipedia requires additional proof of the photo's copyright, that can be provided by the Uploader and/or current band management upon request. Joe Burd(TALK) 14:58, 1 January 2010 (PDT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Folgersonurbutt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- watermarked as from icanhascheezburger.com (c) - licensed as CC3.0 PD self Skier Dude (talk) 07:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Film screenshot; highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder of film Skier Dude (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:María Félix De Noche.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Publicity shot or film screenshot; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Itnltd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- collage of multiple (c) images; no sources; uploader not able to release as PD Skier Dude (talk) 07:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bts book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Book cover; no source, no metadata; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dan sanders.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- stated "publicity photo" with no other source; no metadata; possible uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Anna sathe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Painting/2-D drawing of a notable individual. Probably copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2005 Xentenario Alt2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2006 Away2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2006 Local2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2007 Loca2l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to be cropped from a historical image of some sort. Likely copyrighted, judging by the provided source. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:6ugliveraw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 10:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:6ugfhm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be cropped from a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright owner. FASTILYsock(TALK) 10:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Photograph of painting Memphisto (talk) 13:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the artists and photographer have all given up the relevant rights to their images to fit with whatever it takes for their images not to be deleted from WikipediaRodolph (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Photograph of painting Memphisto (talk) 13:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the artists and photographer have all given up the relevant rights to their images to fit with whatever it takes for their images not to be deleted from WikipediaRodolph (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FingaskMuralKey2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Scan of drawing Memphisto (talk) 13:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the artists and scanner & co-maker of the key have all given up the relevant rights to their images to fit with whatever it takes for their images not to be deleted from WikipediaRodolph (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- no indication that Soap Opera Digest and/or GILBERT FLORES/CELEBRITY PHOTO has released this into public domain. Uploader appear to have a history of this per all the redink on their talk page Jack Merridew 19:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).
- reason Gabi Hernandez 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.