Feet aren't really my thing, but I've seen enough to know it's probably the most common fetish out there (as far as stuff that isn't based on obviously sexually-involved parts of the body).
Also, you commented "Give ‘em a whiff" on >>3557407 , so maybe you're not the best judge of what's normal and what's not. (Neither am I, for that matter, but I'm not the one kink-shaming something as mainstream as foot fetishes.)
traffik: @GreenPenguin: But that's why it's a fetish. If you're a guy and you're turned on by vaginas, you don't call that a fetish. You just call it being straight. Fetishes usually revolve around an attraction to something that's considered outside the usual. In that regard, pretty much any fetish can be called 'weird'. But what's weird to me is that you're singling out pretty much the most common, vanilla fetish of the bunch-- instead of something truly out there, like that one person who posts nothing but pictures of characters getting stung by bees.
Feet aren't really my thing, but I've seen enough to know it's probably the most common fetish out there (as far as stuff that isn't based on obviously sexually-involved parts of the body).
Also, you commented "Give ‘em a whiff" on >>3557407 , so maybe you're not the best judge of what's normal and what's not. (Neither am I, for that matter, but I'm not the one kink-shaming something as mainstream as foot fetishes.)
Yeah. I said that, in my comment.
See what I'm saying?